His employer says the crash "wasn't work related" - that can gut your Bowling Green claim
“the driver who threw me off my motorcycle in bowling green was working but his boss is saying use his personal insurance and leave the company out can they do that”
— Kayla R., Bowling Green
You got launched off a motorcycle, broke your wrist and collarbone, and now the driver's employer is trying to act like this was just a personal errand so the bigger insurance policy never comes into play.
If the driver was working when he hit you, his boss does not get to wave a hand and make the company disappear.
That's the first thing.
In Bowling Green, this fight usually starts fast. A crash on Scottsville Road, Campbell Lane, Nashville Road, or near the I-65 ramps turns into a coverage argument before your sling even stops digging into your neck. The driver's personal insurer says, "Maybe this was business use." The employer says, "He was off the clock." And meanwhile you're at TriStar Greenview or The Medical Center trying to figure out how to shower with a busted collarbone and a wrecked wrist while your spouse is active duty and not home to carry any of this.
The real fight is over whose policy has to pay
For a motorcycle wreck, that matters a lot.
A personal auto policy may have lower limits. A commercial policy often has more coverage, and sometimes there are umbrella policies sitting behind it. That can be the difference between a claim that barely covers the ER, surgery, follow-ups, and missed income, and a claim that actually reflects what this crash did to your life.
Employers and insurers know that.
So they start slicing the facts.
They'll say the driver was "just on lunch." Or "heading home." Or "running a personal errand." Or using a personal vehicle, so somehow the company has nothing to do with it. That's not the end of the analysis in Kentucky. The real question is whether the driver was acting in the course and scope of employment when the crash happened.
That includes things like making deliveries, driving to a work site, carrying company tools, picking up materials, running an errand for a supervisor, traveling between job locations, or using the vehicle in a way that benefited the employer.
If the driver was doing company business when you got thrown off your bike, the company may be on the hook even if the boss now wants to play dumb.
Why broken bones are not "minor" when you ride a motorcycle
Insurance companies love to treat a wrist fracture and collarbone fracture like clean, temporary injuries.
Cast. Sling. Physical therapy. Move on.
That's the sales pitch.
Reality can be uglier. A broken wrist can leave permanent loss of grip strength, reduced range of motion, chronic pain, hardware problems, or nerve symptoms. A broken collarbone can heal with malunion, leave shoulder weakness, limit overhead motion, or make carrying, lifting, and even driving miserable long after the x-rays say "healed."
For somebody handling a household alone while a service member is away, that damage hits harder. Child care, groceries, laundry, getting on and off post, loading a trunk, even turning a steering wheel on Russellville Road or Veterans Memorial Lane can become a problem.
And when recovery plateaus, the value of the claim changes.
That's a phrase worth paying attention to: recovery plateaus.
The money picture changes when your recovery stalls
Early on, insurers act like the case is just about current bills.
It isn't.
Once your doctors start saying you've reached maximum medical improvement, or close to it, the conversation shifts to what you're left with. Not what hurt in week two. What still doesn't work in month eight or month fourteen.
That's where these pieces start driving value:
- permanent impairment or disability rating
- future orthopedic care, injections, hardware removal, or pain treatment
- a life care plan if the limitations are serious and ongoing
- vocational rehab if you can't return to the same work
- loss of earning capacity, not just wages already missed
If your wrist never regains normal function, or your shoulder stays weak and unstable, this stops being a simple broken-bone claim. Maybe you can still work, but not the same way. Maybe not full time. Maybe not in the same field. Maybe you can do the job, but only with pain and less speed, which matters if your work is hands-on.
That future loss is money.
Not imaginary money. Real money.
Kentucky insurers will look for a way to shrink this
Here's what most people don't realize: they do not need a perfect excuse. They just need a usable one.
Maybe you had a prior shoulder issue. Maybe an old neck injury. Maybe something from a crash years ago. They will try to shovel today's problems onto yesterday's medical records. Kentucky law does not give them a free pass to do that. If this wreck aggravated a preexisting condition, the worsening still matters. The driver takes you as you were, not as some healthier version of you they wish existed.
The same goes for the "not on the job" argument. Don't assume the first explanation is the truth just because a company representative said it confidently.
What actually helps prove the company was involved
This is where details matter more than speeches.
The time of day. The route. Whether he was headed to a customer, job site, warehouse, or supplier. Whether he was carrying work equipment. Whether the employer owned the vehicle, reimbursed mileage, required the trip, tracked him by app, or called him right before the crash. In Bowling Green, that can mean records tied to routes around industrial areas, supplier runs, or travel connected to plants and contractors servicing bigger operations across the region. Kentucky is full of work traffic tied to manufacturing and logistics, and not just up near Georgetown and Toyota.
A company can deny all it wants. Phone records, dispatch logs, GPS data, time sheets, vehicle-use policies, and witness statements can wreck that denial fast.
If both personal and commercial policies may apply, don't let anyone force a false choice early. Personal coverage first, commercial later. Commercial first, personal excess. Both triggered. It depends on the facts and the policy language.
But "leave the company out of it" is usually not a legal answer.
It's a money move.
Donna Tackett
on 2026-03-30
The information above is educational and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every injury case turns on its own facts. If you're dealing with this right now, get a professional opinion.
Find out what your case is worth →